‘“Nec aranearum sane textus ideo melior, quia ex se fila gignunt. Nec noster
vilior quia ex alienis libamus ut apes.”’ Just. Lips. Monit. Polit. lib. i. cap. 1.
Some late writers on natural history seem doubtful whe-
ther the numerous distinct races of men ought to be consi-
dered as mere varieties, which have arisen from degenera-
tion, or as so many species altogether different. The cause
of this seems chiefly to be, that they took too narrow a view
in their researches; selected, perhaps, two races the most
different from each other possible, and, overlooking the inter-
mediate races that formed the connecting links between
them, compared these two together; or, they fixed their
[Seite 285] attention too much on man, without examining other species
of animals, and comparing their varieties and degeneration
with those of the human species. The first fault is, when
one, for example, places together a Senegal negro and an
European Adonis, and at the same time forgets that there
is not one of the bodily differences of these two beings,
whether hair, colour, features, etc. which, does not gra-
dually run into the same thing of the other, by such a va-
riety of shades that no physiologist or naturalist is able to
establish a certain boundary between these gradations, and
consequently between the extremes themselves.
The second fault is, when people reason as if man were
the only organised being in nature, and consider the varie-
ties in his species to be strange and problematical, without
reflecting that all these varieties are not more striking or
more uncommon than those with which so many thousands
of other species of organised beings degenerate, as it were
before our eyes.
As my observations respecting the bodily conformation,
and mental capacity of the negroes* may serve to warn man-
kind against the first error, and at the same time to refute it,
I shall here offer a few remarks to refute the false conclusion
which might be formed from a careless comparison of the de-
generations among the human race with the varieties among
other animals, and for that purpose shall draw a comparison
between the human race and that of swine†.
More reasons than one have induced me to make choice
of swine for this comparison; but in particular, because
they have a great similarity, in many respects, to man: not,
however, in the form of their entrails, as people formerly
believed, and therefore studied the anatomy of the human
[Seite 286] body purposely in swine; so that even, in the last century,
a celebrated dispute, which arose between the physicians of
Heidelberg and those of Durlach, respecting the position of
the heart in man, was determined in consequence of orders
from government, by inspecting a sow, to the great triumph
of the party who really were in the wrong. Nor is it because
in the time of Galen, according to repeated assertions, hu-
man flesh was said to have a taste perfectly similar to that of
swine*; nor because the fat†, and the tanned hides of both,
are very like to each other; but because both, in regard to
the economy of their bodily structure, taken on the whole,
shew unexpectedly, on the first view, as well as on closer
examination, a very striking similitude.
Both, for example, are domestic animals; both omnivora;
both are dispersed throughout all the four quarters of the
world; and both consequently are exposed, in numerous ways,
to the principal causes of degeneration arising from climate,
mode of life, nourishment, etc.; both, for the same reason,
are subject to many diseases, and, what is particularly
worthy of remark, to diseases rarely found among other
animals than men and swine, such as the stone in the
bladder‡; to diseases exclusively peculiar to these two,
such as the worms, found in meassed swine§.
Another reason, however, why I have made choice of
swine for the present comparison is, because the degenera-
tion and descent from the original race are far more certain in
these two animals, and can be better traced than in the va-
rieties of other domestic animals. For no naturalist, I be-
lieve, has carried his scepticism so far as to doubt the descent
of the domestic swine from the wild boar; which is so much
the more evident, as it is well known that wild pigs, when
caught, may be easily rendered as tame and familiar as do-
mestic swine*: and the contrary also is the case; for if the
latter by any accident get into the woods, they as readily
become wild again, so that there are instances of such animals
being shot for wild swine; and it has not been till they were
opened and found castrated, that people were led to a disco-
very of their origin, and how and at what time they ran
away†. It is well ascertained, that, before the discovery of
America by the Spaniards, swine were unknown in that
quarter of the world, and that they were afterwards carried
thither from Europe. All the varieties, therefore, through
[Seite 288] which this animal has since degenerated, belong, with the
original European race, to one and the same species; and
since no bodily difference is found in the human race, as
will presently appear, either in regard to stature, colour, the
form of the cranium, etc. which is not observed in the same
proportion among the swine race, while no one, on that ac-
count, ever doubts that all these different kinds are merely
varieties that have arisen from degeneration through the in-
fluence of climate, etc. this comparison, it is to be hoped,
will silence those sceptics who have thought proper, on ac-
count of these varieties in the human race, to admit more
than one species.
In this respect the Patagonians*, as is well known, have
afforded the greatest employment to anthropologists. The
romantic tales, however, of the old travellers, who give to
these inhabitants of the southern extremity of America a
stature of ten feet and more, are scarcely worth notice; and
even the more modest relations of later English navigators, who
make their height from six to seven feet, have been doubted
by other travellers, who, on the same coast, sought for such
children of Enoch in vain. But we shall admit every thing
said of the extraordinary size of these Patagonians, by Byron,
Wallis, and Carteret, the first of whom† assigns to their
chief, and several of his attendants, a height of not less than
seven feet, as far as could be determined by the eye; the se-
cond‡, who asserts that he actually measured them, gives to
the greater part of them from 5 feet 10 inches to 6 feet; to
some 6 feet 5 inches, and 6 feet 6; but to the tallest, 6 feet 7
inches: and this account is confirmed by the last-mentioned
[Seite 289] of the above circumnavigators*. Now, allowing this to be
the case, it is not near such an excess of stature as that ob-
served in many parts of America among the swine, originally
carried thither from Europe; and of these I shall mention in
particular those of Cuba†, which are more than double the
size of the original stock in Europe.
The natives of Guinea, Madagascar, New Holland, New
Guinea, &c. are black; many American tribes are reddish
brown, and the Europeans are white. An equal difference
is observed among swine in different countries. In Piedmont,
for example, they are black. When I passed through that
country, during the great fair for swine at Salenge, I did not
see a single one of any other colour. In Bavaria, they are
reddish brown; in Normandy, they are all white.
Human hair is, indeed, somewhat different from swine’s
bristles, yet in the present point of view they may be com-
pared with each other. Fair hair is soft, and of a silky texture;
black hair is coarser, and among several tribes, such as the
Abyssinians, Negroes, and the inhabitants of New Holland,
it is woolly, and most so among the Hottentots‡. In the
like manner, among the white swine in Normandy, as I was
assured by an incomparable observer, Sulzer of Ronneburg,
the hair on the whole body is longer and softer than among
other swine; and even the bristles on the back are very little
different, but lie flat, and are only longer than the hair on
the other parts of the body. They cannot, therefore, be
employed by the brush-makers. The difference between the
hair of the wild boar and the domestic swine, particularly
in regard to the softer part between the strong bristles, is, as
is well known, still greater.
The whole difference between the cranium of a negro and
that of an European, is nor in the least degree greater than
that equally striking difference which exists between the cra-
nium of the wild boar and that of the domestic swine.
Those who have not observed this in the animals themselves,
need only to cast their eye on the figure which Daubenton
has given of both.
I shall pass over less national varieties which may be found
among swine as well as among men, and only mention that
I have been assured by Mr. Sulzer that the peculiarity of
having the bone of the leg remarkably long, as is the case
among the Hindoos, has been remarked with regard to the
swine in Normandy. ‘“They stand very long on their hind
legs,”’ says he, in one of his letters; ‘“their back, therefore,
is highest at the rump, forming a kind of inclined plane;
and the head proceeds in the same direction, so that the snout
is not far from the ground.”’ I shall here add, that the swine,
in some countries, have degenerated into races which in sin-
gularity far exceed every thing that has been found strange
in bodily variety among the human race. Swine with solid
hoofs were known to the ancients, and large herds of them
are found in Hungary, Sweden, etc. In the like manner
the European swine, first carried by the Spaniards in 1509
to the island of Cuba, at that time celebrated for its pearl
fishery, degenerated into a monstrous race, with hoofs which
were half a span in length*.
See, for example, Anatomia Porci of the old Arabian Cophon in
the beginning, where he says: Et cum bruta animalia quaedam, ut simia,
in exterioribus nobis inveniantur similia, interiorum partium nulla inveni-
untur adeo similia ut porci.
Galen says, in the tenth book his work on the Power of Simple
Medicines, that tavern-keepers and cooks often served up human flesh in-
stead of swine’s flesh to their guests, without their perceiving it. He him-
self was told by persons worthy of credit, that they had ate of such food in
a public inn with the best appetite, not knowing what it was till they at
length found half a finger, when they became terribly alarmed for fear of
the murderous host, who was, however, soon after caught in the fact and
punished.
Among the wild swine, particularly in Russian Tartary. A pretty
large stone of that kind, forming a part of Baron Asch’s present, is pre-
served in the Academical Museum of Gottingen. Domestic swine, how-
ever, are in many places subject to this malady. See Schwenkfeld Therio-
troph. Silesiae, ut supra.
I was guilty of an error when I said, in the third edition of my
[Seite 286] Manual of Nar. History, p. 464, that Goze was the first who placed the
animal nature of the measles in swine beyond all doubt. I now find that
in the last century Malpighi gave an accurate description of the disease,
accompanied also with a figure of the worms. See his Opera Posthuma,
London 1697, fol. p. 84. ‘“In suibus verminosis, qui vulgariter lazaroli
dicuntur, multiplices stabulantur vermes, unde horum animalium carnes
publico edicto prohibentur. Occurrunt autem copiosi intra fibras muscu-
losas natium; obvia namque oblonga vesica quasi folliculus diaphano hu-
more refertus, in quo natat globosum corpus candidum, quod disrupto
folliculo leviter compressum eructat vermem,qui foras exeritur, et videtur
emulari cornua emissilia cochlearum, ejus enim annuli intra se reflexi con-
duntur, et ira conglobatur animal. In apice attollitur capitulum. A con-
globato verme ad extremum folliculi umbilicale quasi vas producitur.”’ The
late Werner, as far as I know, was the first who discovered in the human
body the same kind of worms as those found in measled swine.
This experiment was not long ago made with the best consequences
in the abbey of St. Urban, in the canton of Lucerne.
See Lehmann’s Naturliche merkwürdigkeiten im Meissnischen Ober-
ertzgebirge, p. 605.
Or rather Pata-chonians, for the people themselves are called Chonos;
and because their feet, covered with raw hides, gave them a likeness to
a bear’s paws, they were called by the first Spanish navigators pata-
chonos. See Forster in Comment. Soc. Scient. Gottingens. vol. iii. p. 127.